16 Responses to “Nobody Likes Hillary Clinton”

1. Sheldon on August 6th, 2007 2:35 pm

   The American people are demonstrating a healthy instinct in their collective mistrust of Hillary Rodham Clinton. As explored in my book, “Hillary Clinton Nude: Naked Ambition, Hillary Clinton And America’s Demise,” the previous Clinton administration is a preview of the nightmare we are in store for, if Hillary Clinton becomes the nation’s 44th president.

2. VanReuter on August 6th, 2007 4:14 pm

   I don’t know what’s funnier; Your silly sophomoric anti-Hillary photo(shop) or thinking that any African-Americans would even bother to READ, let alone heed your, “advice”.
   Looking forward to eight years of whinny, unintentionally hysterical rantings from you and your ilk, during BOTH her terms as President. Try reading RCP, Ras, and spinning THEIR polls to fit your conclusions. Rudy’s a souffle, and if you knew anything about New York, and especially NYC, you wouldn’t be praying for Saint Rudy to save you.
   Keep up the (unintentional) humor.

   Van

3. Michael Kraft on August 6th, 2007 5:18 pm

   Id say the photo is funnier.

   And your right, I only lived 26 years in Upstate New York, and my mother works on the Hillary Campaign in Rochester, NY, so i have no frame of reference.

   But hey, Great point!

   Also here some polls for you:

   FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. March 27-28, 2007.
   “Thinking ahead to the next presidential election, if the 2008 general election were held today and the candidates were

   Rudy Giuliani (R) = 40%
   Hillary Clinton (D) = 42%

   Time Poll conducted by Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas (SRBI) Public Affairs. March 23-26, 2007.

   “If the election for president were held today and the candidates were [see below], the Democrat, and [see below], the Republican, and you had to choose, for which of these candidates would you vote?”

   Rudy Giuliani (R) = 50%
   Hillary Clinton (D) = 41%

   McLaughlin & Associates (R). March 21-25, 2007.

   Rudy Giuliani (R) = 42%
   Hillary Clinton (D) = 40%

   So it looks like I know as much about New York as you could possible have imagined, and I have 3 real polls showing it is Hillary Rodham-Castro that should be concerned about a showdown. No spin required.

   I do know she won with 67% in her Senate race.
   i also Know Rudy won with 59% in his last reelection in NYC, and that was before his best moments during 911.

   Also keep in mind he doesnt need to win NY to win, since no Republicans are expected to win NY.
   I would wonder what the over taxed New Yorker would tink about the prospects of higher taxes still under her health care ideas, as opposed to Rudy lowering taxes and creating revenue at the same time as he did in NY?

   Thanks for you comment though, on the right we respect the right of people to have opinions.

4. Michael Kraft on August 6th, 2007 5:24 pm

   Dont hate the messenger, those aren’t my polls. I didnt spin anything the entire point of the poll was she has the highest supporters count and the lowest likeability.

   “Facts are stubborn things”
   Abraham Lincoln

5. VanReuter NY NY on September 3rd, 2007 4:30 pm

   Polls from March, about as fresh as your humor.
   Don’t you realize that your photo is not just in bad taste, but adolescent, to boot? I’m sure all three of your regular visitors never tire of it, wait, make that TWO, as I am one of the 3.

   That you had to dig that far back, in August, to…Were you making a point? If you were it wasn’t that facts are stubborn things, it would be that you are someone who desperately looks for any facts that will support your supposition, no matter how little currency or pertinence there may be to them.

   Smoke these polls from sept 2007;

   http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national-primary.html

   http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_primaries.html

   Fred will crush Rudy and Hillary will CRUSH Fred.

   I like this headline;

   New York: Clinton Dominates Giuliani

   but the poll is better;

   Tuesday, August 28, 2007

   In a race between two New York politicians, New York voters stay with the party line and prefer Hillary Clinton over Rudy Giuliani by a TWENTY-FIVE point margin, 58% to 33%.

   The former first lady is viewed FAVORABLY by 63% of New York voters, while America’s Mayor is viewed favorably by 47%.”

   http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/new_york_clinton_dominates_giuliani

   So much for your site’s silly title. Looks like a lot more people like senator Clinton than this vanity, hate-page.

   Keep up the good work. I hear there are some polls from LAST YEAR, you might find interesting.

   Van

6. Michael Kraft on September 3rd, 2007 7:26 pm

   Nice selective stats that are not relevent to the post

   “http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national-primary.html”

   This poll shows how she is beating other DEMS.

   Dems which have far less competition. She champion of the minor leagues.

   Shes ahead of only one real contender “Obama” and he just got done saying he wants to meet Castro and bomb pakistan.

   So shes ahead of no competition.
   Agains those polls only compares primaries so there is no relevence at all.

   And your other “poll”
   New York: Clinton Dominates Giuliani

   Is referring only to New York, which will vote Dem anyway.

   If its 99-1% its still the same elctorals, so it makes no difference in the actual election.

   Shall I look for a TEXAS only poll? and say that is relevent too?

7. Michael Kraft on September 3rd, 2007 7:36 pm

   http://www.electoral-vote.com/

   Nice site shows NY as the strongest Blue state in the nation.

   So why does Hillary winning there matter? Kerry won there too, and where is he right now?

8. VanReuter NY NY on September 5th, 2007 11:35 am

   http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national.html
   Nice selective stats…from someone who posted SIX MONTH OLD POLLS(!) to make their, “point”.
   Here are ALL the selective polls from, RCP, Ras.
   “And your other “poll”
   New York: Clinton Dominates Giuliani
   Is referring only to New York, which will vote Dem anyway.”

   Yes it is of NO significance that he is getting CRUSHED in his home state. It isn’t a big electoral vote state anyway.

   That she beats EVERY republican in the RCP averages (rudy by 1, Fred by 6+, McCain by about 4 Mitt by about 10% certainly makes a mockery of your little hate-site’s title.
   Oh, and those would be the most recent polls.
   It will only get worse for you as the season progresses.

   Keep the site going, please,

   Van

9. Michael Kraft on September 5th, 2007 2:37 pm

   2000 Al Gore Won New York with 66%
   2004 John Kerry Won New York with 59%

   Both lost the election. Neither became president. Seems pretty common sense stuff that DEMS win there no matter who is running.

   Even the coward and traitor Jimmy Castro Carter won 44% in NY, even though he got beat by a landslide everywhere else.

10. VanReuter NY NY on September 13th, 2007 4:20 pm

    Update- Hi, nice to see the traffic on your site seems to consist of you and ME. lol

    Anyway, now that Fred’s in and Rudy’s on the decline, let’s see how Hillary is doing on the national and state level against the REPUBLICANS;

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national.html

    Beating Fred, Beating Rudy

    http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/massachusetts_2008_presidential_election

    Crushing everyone

    http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/minnesota_2008_presidential_election

    Crushing everyone

    http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/virginia_2008_presidential_election

    Winning in Virginia

    Everywhere we look it’s all Hillary.

    That you call Jimmy Carter, a former President of our country, a coward and a traitor, a man whose shoes you couldn’t shine, a winner of the Nobel Peace prize, who has done more in humanitarian work to eradicate disease in Africa, through the Carter foundation, than any living human, is further testament to your sad and warped worldview.
    Please keep the site going all the way to Hillary’s inauguration, and I promise to send you a picture of me with her at one of the celebrations.

    Van

11. Michael Kraft on September 14th, 2007 12:22 am

    Those are some good states you hand selected.
    Mass.? Really she’s winning there…..that is big news, that worked out so well for Gore and Kerry.

    Throw in California, Illinois and New York and she is doing as good an John Kerry did.

    You Mean Jimmy Carter who was Admiring The efficiency of hamas while the are shooting people in lines in the strret or Jimmy Carter who couldnt get the hostages free in Iran, or Jimmy Carter who was in Venezuela Annoucing Chavez won a “fair election” 1 hour after thousands of electronic voting machines that Chavez purchased himself and used for the first time ever announced him the winner. (he is also a computer genius apparently.)

    Machines which since then have been found to be frauds—> http://vcrisis.com

    Another bang up job by the Carter Foundation. The next 30 years of Castro-like rule can in part thank the great work of Jimmy Carter.

    Yep, no man has been a bigger hero of communists, socialists and anti-american leaders Like Jimmy Carer and his shined shoes. Maybe he can get them cleaned next time he visits Castro.

    Hes a sellout, socialist traitor.

    As for you other “insults?” Ron paul got 11,000 visits 4 days ago and 7000 yesterday, and Rudy 900 Today,…

    Maybe If I burn a flag more Hillary supporters will show up with gas cans?

12. VanReuter NY NY on September 14th, 2007 11:31 am

    “Maybe If I burn a flag more Hillary supporters will show up with gas cans?”

    You begin to show your true colors. You are a hateful, irrational man. What percentage of reasonable SANE adults could read your, “reply”, above and not be appalled by the slanders, cherry-picked by you against a former President. If the President being slandered was a con, you’d call the post, “Traitorous”, whereas I will just call yours irrational.

    Once again, pick a poll yourself, from RCP, from Ras, from FoxNews, from ANYWHERE, and it’a all Hillary, and you know it. That’s why you don’t have anything to respond with besides your sputtering anti-Carter screed.

    Friday, September 14, 2007

    Senator Hillary Clinton and former Mayor Rudy Giuliani remain virtually tied in a hypothetical Election 2008 match-up. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows Clinton with 46% of the vote and Giuliani with 45%.

    The two New Yorkers—who recently exchanged barbs over General Petraeus’s report to Congress on the Iraq war—have been in a pitched battle for much of the year. While Giuliani led by three percentage points a couple of weeks ago, the two candidates have been just a point or less apart in five of eight polls since April.

    The new survey also shows Clinton LEADING former Senator Fred Thompson 48% to 43%. That’s similar to an August 28 poll, taken about a week before Thompson declared his candidacy.”
    Nobody likes her?

    Three-out-of-four Democrats (75%) believe that if Clinton wins the nomination, she is at least somewhat likely to win the White House in 2008. Seventy-three percent (73%) of Democrats say the same about Edwards and 69% think Obama is at least somewhat likely to win if nominated. However, there is a higher degree of confidence in Clinton than other candidates. Forty-one percent (41%) of Democrats say that Clinton is Very Likely to win the White House if nominated. Just 26% say the same about Obama and 24% have that confidence in Edwards.

    When the question is asked of all voters, not just Democrats, a similar pattern emerges. If nominated, Clinton is considered at least somewhat likely to win by 53% of all voters. Fifty-four percent (54%) say the same about Edwards and 55% about Obama. However, 24% of all voters say that if Clinton is nominated, she is Very Likely to win it all. Just 17% say that Obama is Very Likely to win the White House while 16% say a victory in November is Very Likely for Edwards.”

    Nobody likes her?

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national-primary.html

    Leads by almost TWENTY POINTS

    Nobody likes her

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national.html

    EVERY SEPTEMBER POLL has her beating both Fred and Rudy

    Nobody likes her?

    SC up by 12
    Fla up by 21
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_primaries.html

    She leads in EVERY poll there.
    I’m not cherry-picking Cleopatra, you’re just in DENIAL!
    Please, produce some documentation to show how Nobody Likes Hillary Clinton. You know you can’t, and that you are likely to be throwing your shoe at the tv on election night November, 2008, when at about 11:20pm(write that down) Brit Hume (I KNOW what channel you’ll be watching.) hangs his head and says, “President-Elect Hillary Clinton, the 44th President of the United States of America.”

13. Michael Kraft on September 14th, 2007 12:37 pm

    So you put her in a dead heat with Giuliani, and ahead of Fred Thompson by 5% only 1 week after he decided to run.

    I see a draw and a year to go, by your own stats.

    And why is it calling Carter a traitor is so awful, while Cindy Sheehan calling bush a Nazi is free speech and peaceful protest.

    Do you actually have any knowledge of his involvment in the Chavez elections, his buddy the spokesman for anti-american hate speech?

    And this: “When the question is asked of all voters, not just Democrats, a similar pattern emerges. If nominated, Clinton is considered at least somewhat likely to win by 53% of all voters.”

    Is the opinion of whether they think she CAN WIN, not if the person asked wants her to or will vote for her.

    Of course she can win….

    “Clinton is considered at least somewhat likely to win by 53% of all voters”

    Um duh. So half the poeple think she has a chance in hell…..well that is rocket science.

    So this equates to asking what they have heard or have read in the news, not their opinion, a useless poll.

    “hangs his head and says, “President-Elect Hillary Clinton, the 44th President of the United States of America.”

    All around the globe, terrorists, illegal immigrants, communists, socialists and Norman Hsu’s lawyer will let out a giant cheer!

    All of them will be receiving a presidential pardon.

    I guess the friend of my enemy is my enemy.
    Applies to Carter and Clinton.

14. Michael Kraft on September 14th, 2007 12:38 pm

    To answer you other question…you got off topic.

    Its not CAN SHE MAYBE WIN, EVEN I KNOW she can win and has a decent chance. With 55 million dollars and Bill Clinton standing behind me at every rally, even I could win.

    Its not about winning its about this poll’s results.

    “Opinion Dynamics Corp. conducted the national telephone poll of 900 registered voters for FOX News from June 5 to June 6. The poll has a 3-point error margin.

    “With the “if nominated” caveat, 35 percent of voters think it is very likely Clinton could win the presidency, while 29 percent think it is very likely Giuliani could be elected and 23 percent think the same of Obama…”

    “..Despite Clinton having the largest percentage of voters who consider her electable, she receives the lowest ratings among the front-runners tested on being likeable, and honest and trustworthy.

15. Michael Kraft on September 14th, 2007 12:48 pm

    I hadn’t realized you are a professional Hillary Clinton Blog comment troll, who surfs around to attack all other candidates Dem and Rep. With this in mind have a nice life.

    Bash Rudy:
    http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/29/337581.aspx

    Bash Obama:
    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/18/arkansas-governor-set-to-endorse-clinton/

    Bash Edwards:
    http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/08/21/326913.aspx?p=1

    Bash Obama again:
    (watch the Democrats disown you in this one…too funny)
    http://www.dmholmeslaw.com/appiesboard/viewtopic.php?p=11264&sid=a947203c05b690fe509c52bcbd934877

    “Who is this Vanreuter? He/She seems more interested in downing Obama than highlighting the strong points of Hillary Clinton!! I’m ashamed to be called a democrat with such a person”

    Bash Rudy again:
    “http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/the-clintons-hit-the-hamptons/”

    Trolling for friends here:
    “http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=241″

    Best of luck to you, thanks, bye.

16. The Raving Badger on September 14th, 2007 4:27 pm

    MK, you have little grasp on reality. None whatsoever. I suggest you read and watch something other than Fox for a change. Maybe MSNBC, ABC,etc.. Try a decent paper like the LA Times or even, oh dat, the NYT. Reading Page Six for your political juice just doesn’t cut in grown-up world.

leave your opinion on this subject
Or check out related stickers and shirts in the store.