YouTube Censors Ron Paul?
Author: Michael Kraft
CBtL3NIcAvU
Here is a hot little item you may or may not be aware of.
A video now on Youtube that consists of speeches of John F Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Ron Paul.
The video is just speeches and music but has been repeatedly removed from Youtube for no apparent reason according to the original author.
Now the people have found a solution to this censorship. The author has encouraged fans of the video to download it and re-upload it “in duplicate” so Youtube can no longer remove the message.
Take a look, it on there 2-3 dozen times already.
If you are not a Ron Paul supporter after hearing his words and how similar his beliefs are to Dr. King and President Kennedy, then you need to check your pulse.
|
You can comment below or even write your own online article instantly right here. |
7 Responses to “YouTube Censors Ron Paul?”
leave your opinion on this subject
Or check out related stickers and shirts in the store.
YouTube Censors Ron Paul?
CBtL3NIcAvU
Here is a hot little item you may or may not be aware of.
A video now on Youtube that consists of speeches of John F Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Ron Paul.
The video is just speeches and music but has been repeatedly removed from Youtube for no apparent reason according to the original [...]
 Which recent candidate do you believe has a history of working with hispanic voters? |
|
What best describes your view on the Democrat pushed bailouts of companies, banks and in general? |
|
What is the one issue your ideal candidate neds a solution for! |
But didn’t Ron Paul call MLK a sex predator in that Ron Paul Newsletter?
No he didnt, Ron pual doesnt write for that 20 year old newsletter. You just ate that CNN smear up without using common sense.
The presence of state secrets, possessed by a privileged few, is inherently a devaluation of the citizen and an establishment of hierarchy. The possession of private information about a specific citizen, or group of citizens, or even the trends of unspecified citizens, without their consent — surely we can agree that this is a bad thing? National security is not information shared by all members of a nation, even an ostensibly democratic one. It is information within the hands of a select few, who say “trust us… trust us and GIVE US MONEY; but we cannot tell you what we do with it, and you would probably not approve if we told you.” Whether or not you consider anarchism a ludicrous proposition, I believe any reasonable person must believe that an informed participatory government (whether democratic or representative republic) fundamentally depends on the quantity and quality of knowledge possessed by its citizens. When there is a restriction of information, the democratic process (and by extension, the citizenry) never benefits.
The existence of certain technologies (for instance, nuclear power and nuclear weapons), certain governmental behaviors (spying, human rights violations, negotiating individual liberties), and so forth demand the existence of state secrets. Is it by coincidence that many of us consider the use of nuclear weapons, spying, torture, and unreasonable coercion to be unethical behaviors? We may consider monopolies on certain information to be justified when possessed by a corporation — for instance, I can buy that Apple should retain the right to conceal the source code to OS X — but can I really justify paying money to an organization that uses that money to spy on me without my consent, or to piss off people halfway around the world.
Surely anyone who cares about the future of this country and its people — whether they be classic conservative, anarchist, liberal, libertarian, social democrat, whatever — has to howl for the blood of these pigs. Fuck them, fuck the “national security” excuses for harmful state secrets that limit our freedoms and weaken our ability to participate in the political process, fuck the stooges in high places sacrificing their integrity for cash, fuck ‘em all.
Sorry for the language.
Ron Paul has always admired MLK and never said such a thing. It was someone else writing under Paul’s name. The head of the NAACP spoke out and put to an end once and for all the smear campaign that Dr. Paul is a racist. He said he has known him for 20 years and he is anything but a racist.
People from all over the world wish they could vote for Dr. Paul. The guy is really another MLK, JFK, and even a GHANDI. He just wants to set everyone free!
(And we are NOT free….Just see America, from Freedom to Fascism on google video if you think we are….)
“But didn’t Ron Paul call MLK a sex predator in that Ron Paul Newsletter?”
UM NO.
Just because someone put Ron Paul’s name on the top doesnt mean he wrote it.
CNN is a disgrace, they find something “a supporter” wrote and they try to spin it like Ron Paul wrote it or had ANYTHING to do with it.
Ron Paul is the favorite Republican of Black America, and CNN is a disgrace. They ignore him when hes winning and out fundraising ALL OTHER canddates, then SUDDENLY they decide to coer him to try and blame some 15 year old coment by a supporter on him?
They didnt interview him when he got 14% of the vote in Nevada, but they give him tons of airtime to smear him?
A completely staged attempt to end his campaign.
Why didnt CNN go find out who wrote that article? With their “BEST POLITICAL TEAM”?
Why not find a video clip or any kind of actual FACT before trying to link Ron Paul to that?
CNN reached a new low with that garbage.
How can the media ignore the Louisiana stuff.Reporters just live for that sort of dirt.In any other election year that sort of thing would have been run into the ground on T.V. This is verrry suspicious.
NICE ARTICLE!! NORTH CAROLINA ROCKS.. WOLFPACK BABY!! I BLEED RED…
RON PAUL REVOLUTION!!
OF COURSE HE’S CENSORED. PAUL’S CIA. DIDNT YOUR MOMMA TELL YOU NEVER TO TRUST A GUY WITH 2 FIRST NAMES??? Ron Paul lead the delegation out of Texas to get Reagan elected President of the U.S. PAUL CAMPAIGN IS ONE BIG PSY OP