Global Warming Reality

Author: Michael Kraft
Published: March 13, 2008 
Check out the free newsletter!
Related: American Culture     Culture     Environment     Global Warming

Well, after enjoying a segment of Glenn Beck showcasing the 400+ scientists meeting in New York City today to call global warming the hoax that it is, I now have to see what the MSM is saying.

The two interviewed scientists on Glenn Beck from Harvard and St Johns University, pointed out the complete non-correlation between temperature and CO2 gas.

The largest spike in CO2 emmissions coming after WW2 during a time when for 40 years the average temperatures were dropping.

Don’t believe me and think the liberal media would never lie?

Well here is the CO2 Level chart showing 1958 to 1998, and it goes straight up.

And here is some of NASA’s official temperature figures. Youll notice that all of these drop from 1940-1990. The average temperature dropped in the early 1960’s more than it rose since 2000. If this is global warming then the 1960’s must have been a mini ice age!

Keep in mind the CO2 level’s have risen on a perfect flat line for 90 years, but the average temperatures have gone down for about 1/3 of the past century.

This is why the liberal media like TIME was saying in 1979 that global cooling was coming. They used the exact same data we use today back when it was dropping teperatures for 30 years in a row. During that time the CO2 levels were still rising fast, but the average temperatures where dropping.

Glenn was sure to say how this chart Al Gore likes to pimp is in his book ignores the 30 years when the temps dropped.

I wonder where on that timeline is when he invented the internet?

I first visited the New York Times website which has an entire section dedicated to “climate change”. It used to be called “global warming” but then the globe inconveniently stopped warming.

The New York Times even has a “real cool” chart that shows the north pole melting when you move the slider. Since this is a liberal rag, they need pictures to appeal to the idiots who buy into the stuff.

What is mentioned at the conference is that the South Pole has the greatest Quantity of ice right now, more than anytime in recorded history.

This is why the cool graph doesn’t show the south pole.

Also important to note is that for the last 3-4 years the North Pole temperatures are cooling again and record snowfalls across Asia and North America this year agree with that fact as well.

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html#

The real reason why so many are lining up to tell us their homemade facts can’t be said better than this quote from the NYTimes trying to be sarcastic:

“…. environmental groups, the media and scientists dependent on federal grants have a vested interest in portraying climate change as a catastrophe. “

WOW does that read between the lines for you?

Today’s global warming conference got almost no coverage in the media at all. All day I heard about Hillary and Obama’s TV ads and their cool YouTube videos.

It is clear that if this was Al Gore telling us to recycle toilet paper he would have been on the cover of TIME Magazine.

Just look at the link to the NYTimes special blog on climate change and understand why it is there. I see link after link to articles like:

“Study Details How U.S. Could Cut 28% of Greenhouse Gases”
“Arctic Melt Unnerves the Experts ”
“U.N. Report Describes Risks of Inaction on Climate Change”
“On the Climate Change Beat, Doubt Gives Way to Certainty”

Just page after page about ow sure they are we are doomed. The same thing liberals say Republicans do with terrorism.

Now the liberal religion (as Glenn calls it) is to pay for carbon credits to save the polar bears. If you don’t believe in Global Warming then you are just working for the Oil Companies.

What the liberals leave out is that they apparently work for General Electric, who spends more on lobbyists than all of “Big Oil”.

Remember it is GE that owns NBC and used Monday Night Football to push their agenda. They told everyone to turn off their lights to save the planet. Meanwhile they were playing a game that requires 150,000,000 TV sets be running and is set under 10,000,000 Watts of stadium lighting. And heaven forbid they see what most NFL players drive since they are 6′6″ 290lbs, I assure you it is large and has 8 cylinders.

I guess playing it in the day would mean less advertising money for them to line their pockets with?

The fact is that the news only showing one side of any issue has a fundemental flaw and reeks of agenda. I am glad Glenn has the brainpower to see who owns this message (GE).

What other subject does a “newspaper” ignore all debate and all counter-arguments?

Today 400 Scientists from all over the world and key-note speaker, The Current President of The Czech Republic all met to show why it is a scam, and as the President put it “a sample of social science and not climatology”.

How is it that this group exists yet the NYTimes has nothing but “proof” page after page?

How does a conference have a President of a major European country as the keynote speaker and not get a single respectful article?

Only an agenda gets that much reenforcment.

Next comes the few articles that the liberal media pumped out to try and smear the 400 scientists and the president of the Czech Republic

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/03/AR2008030302781.html

The Washington Post Article bring us great gems of fair reporting like:

” the 2 1/2 -day session poses a stark contrast to the near-unanimous chorus of concern expressed by top U.S. politicians and most of the scientific mainstream.”

They forget to mention how many grants and free money those “sky is falling” scientists received for their cries of doom. Also, they should learn that near-unanimous is the coverage of the issue not the views of those who really research the issue.

Near-unanimous is what the media has achieved over the last 5 years, even though the 1930’s were the hottest decade on record.

Has the NYTimes reporters asked anyone what made the 1930’s hotter than ever decade since then? None of the “near-unanimous” proof ever explains that inconvenient fact.

“After years of voicing doubt, President Bush has said repeatedly that he is convinced that humans are contributing to Earth’s warming “

Well, now suddenly the media thinks Bush’s opinion is a good one to quote? After 7 years of watching the liberal media insult Bush, they suddenly want to cite him as an authority when he agrees with he propaganda.

“(While the IPCC enlisted several hundred scientists from more than 100 countries to work over five years to produce its series of reports, the NIPCC document is the work of 23 authors from 15 nations, some of them not scientists.)”

I love this line above. Not much mixing words just saying our scientists are real and your don’t count. At the same time they are giving awards to Al Gore who has no credentials at all and claimed to have invented the internet.

“Frank O’Donnell, who heads the watchdog group Clean Air Watch, said the conference “looks like the climate equivalent of Custer’s last stand. They seem to have tried to find every last skeptic on Earth and put them in one hotel off Broadway.”"

I am sure we all know who Clean Air Watch votes for and gives campaign funds to. Maybe next time he is burning down houses in Washington State someone should let him know that GE has more lobbying influence than “Big Oil” and that he is just a tool.

“Gene Karpinski, president of the League of Conservation Voters, said he was not surprised that roughly 500 participants had gathered at the meeting. “I’m sure that the flat Earth society had a few final meetings before they broke up.” “

Another relevent quote when the press should be discussing the credentials of the 500 scientists and not looking for a liberal wackjob to come up with a one liner insult to report.

Since when is a one-liner from someone not even in attendence news worthy facts?
Only when it fits the predetermined agenda of the article.

The WSJ.com quotes the Daily Kos as saying ““a gathering of people who may have some science in their backgrounds but have long since sold their soul to the energy industry.””

Another great look at the facts of the story. The two Glenn interiewed had PHD’s and taught at top flight universities. No sign of receipts for their souls.

But of course te Daily Kos has long sold its’ soul to communism and love nothing better than this experiment into the social sciences known as Global Warming hysteria.

A good example of the liberal mind. If they disagree with you don’t discuss facts, just insult them. If you argue what a liberal then they call you some kind of -phobe.

We’ll today’s conference must have been warming-phobes, who just refuse to believe what they hear on AC360 on CNN.

Who are Harvard Physicists to argue with Anderson Cooper and Al Gore?

If it’s on TV then it must be true.

What is more convenient is to be a full blown liberal and just use the media to hide any opposition to what you say is true.

This “activist” saying the media should stop pretending these Harvard educated scientists matter at all and ignore them. We should not let anybody hear their facts because they are inconveniently not his views. This must be why the President of the Czech Republic said that global warming is a way to take away freedom.

The Author Joseph Romm goes on with this gem : “Who cares what non-climate-related factoid or piece of pseudo-science so-called “Climate Skeptics” seize on?”

In true liberal fashion we should hide the other side of an issue and pretend their facts don’t count.

The liberal voice even provides a “real cool” chart showing the temperature changes over the last 100 years. It is true they do go up! Except not from 1940 to 1980 which is the time when CO2 gas spiked more than ever.

The years following WW2 were one of the highest CO2 increases in the last century, but the temperature went down. Thats a fact.

Then the author point out this fake fact “As NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies explains, “The eight warmest years in the GISS record have all occurred since 1998, and the 14 warmest years in the record have all occurred since 1990.” ”

Which he ironically calls a real fact as opposeds to skeptics fake facts. The sad part is that this appears to be the fake fact. You can even find this fake fact repeated places like here.

What this author needs to do is try and read something other than what he sees on the Daily Kos.

Maybe he could start here and see that the 1930’s was the Hottest Decade in the last 100 years. Way back before there were SUV’s we had the hottest year in history.

In fact the 1930’s to 1970 has a huge trend of decreasing tempuratires. This must be why liberal morons like Joseph Romm were all screaming about global cooling back in 1970. Yes it was this same group saying we were all going to freeze to death.

Mr. Romm wrote his article about the last 14 years being the hottest ever before the correction made by NASA. You can read more about their mistake that never go reported here or here or here or even here in the CORRECTED climate data released by NASA.

I guess that means the Mr. Romm was incorrect and was preaching on data later corrected publically? You can decide that for yourself.

What funny is that if I search for hottest year ever on google.com I still get the top 10 results that say it was 2007. All of these results are before NASA fixed the errors and announced this “inconvenient mistake” to the public.

Here are the REAL facts that Al Gore seems to not address when he is hanging out in Hollywood pretending the Oscar belongs to him.

1. The hottest year on record is 1934, not 1998;
2. The third hottest year on record was 1921, not 2006;
3. Three of the five hottest years on record occurred before 1940; and
4. Six of the top 10 hottest years occurred prior to 90 percent of the growth in greenhouse gas emissions during the last century.

Maybe the solution is for all the liberal hippies to hold their breath. Someone should inform them that they are exhaling CO2! If they all hold their breath and never breath again it’s a WIN-WIN situation for everyone.

In short, if you believe in conservation and energy independence then thats great.

I have no problem with saving resources and conservation.

If you think that “global warming” is one of the most important issues facing us as Americans…..then you are just a moron.

Global Warming Global Warming skeptics Global Warming truth Global Warming lies Global Warming conference Global Warming scam Global Warming meeting Global Warming facts Global Warming news Climate Change

Powered by PrestoGifto.com™

Powered by PrestoGifto.com™

Global Warming Reality