Now it makes sense. You need to appeal to your base.

Want to know how to get your site back up?

Calling won’t help as Godaddy is currently working to restore service and getting about 100,000 calls per hour about the outage.
A few more facts:

1) if you have a website hosted by the – it’s down
2) if you have an email address by them – it’s down
3) if you have a ftp storage by them – it’s down
4) if you want to change a domains information – you can’t
5) if you have a domain at Google apps, or goDaddy, or DomainsByProxy – it will be affected (When TTL runs out)
6) if you will call go daddy or visit them on the web – you will get nowhere.

In the latest polls from 24 hours ago, Rasmussen has Romney up by 3% and Gallup has Obama by 1%. Gallup used Registered voters which is far less accurate and historically distort the outcome by about 2-4% in Democrats favor. The Likely voter polls, which are more accurate of the outcome, have all leaned Romney for the past week.

And today, yet another poor jobs report is coming out as I type this and gas has risen in price the last 4 weeks straight to over $4 a gallon yet again.
Hope, Change and wait, wait and wait I guess.

There story of "horrific downpours"!The problem is the Depertment of Transportation has traffic cameras online that surround the stadium and Center City Charlotte. And these are what the area looks like at 7:40pm to 7:50 PM.

These are the three closest DOT cameras all within 1000 meters of the speech location.
Not a single puddle, not a single wet spot on any roads. Click to enlarge. And please Tweet and share this so your liberal friends can some day leanr that everything they hear, believe and listen to is manufactured and a lie. There are so many lies now that it almost doesn’t matter to people anymore

Seldom do polls do such a low number of respondents in their data since the less people you poll th less accurate the poll is. They also point out there is a 5% margin of error which is higher than any other margin of error I have seen on any presidential poll in months.

This “news” source then write the article on their “results” and fills the article with assumptions and sweeping reasons why Romney is losing based on their interview with a registered Democrat Voter.

The article state favorability, which Democrat written article always do since they want to race to be a popularity contest and not a right to lead the nation on aptitude. You’ll notice how they state the statistics for each candidate in a different phrasing.

The ACTUAL number for favorability were 53% for Obama and 43% for so a 10% gap, and the polls in Pennsylvania have on average polled about 8% more Democrats. This poll actually doesn;t tell you who they asked by party which makes the figures complete garbage. But in their article they ignoire this and phrase each candidates result differently making Romney’s sound lower.

Romney 43% Approval in PA is what Obama’s National Approval has been for half his time as president. I never heard the media trying to make him sound unpopular with the same numbers. They also left out that 92% of Pennsylvania’s feel the economy earns a grade of C or Less with over 50% feeling it is a D grade or lower.

“Barely half of poll respondents approved of the job Obama has done as president, a finding that Romney could build on, Geller said. He said he expected the race to tighten.

But only about four in 10 respondents had a favorable view of Romney, who, starting with this week’s Republican National Convention, must burnish a personal image tarnished by a summer’s worth of negative Obama ads.

We also get another poll from the “Morning Call” another local newspaper where they asked on 422 voters. This sample size is so small it too is useless and brags a 5% margin of error. This newspaper is owned the “Tribune”, who also owns the “la Times”.

But as we have pointed out, these polls by liberal owned local newspapers have done their job of distorting any real polling or facts.
CNN poll of polls and Realclearpolitics.com will take these polls and average them in with much more accurate ones and publish a distorted number.

Polls are information and those who purposely produce bad information with bad methodology have their own agenda.

Why else would any biased source publish polls with sample sizes so small and margins of error so high?

“Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney has opened up a 1-point lead in the key battleground state of Wisconsin, according to a poll released Tuesday.

The poll by Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling shows Mr. Romney leading President Obama 48 percent to 47 percent in the Badger State. The results are identical to those from a Rasmussen Reports poll released last week.” From (http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/aug/21/poll-romney-grabs-lead-wisconsin/)

All Polls conducted in the last 3 weeks has Romney up by 1.5% in Florida.

This same dirty little secret exists in Iowa too. Only one national poll in August and it shows Romney winning Iowa. This number is also being diluted by 2 other polls being considered from PPP (Democrat pollster) and WeaskAmerica (Democrat pollster). The PPP poll says Obama +5 but is over 3 weeks old. A quick look at the past results from PPP shows they are far from a credible source. They have most of their polls around Obama +10% while no other pollster is above 7% this year. Take a look at the past polls for Iowa and notice that of all the polls being used, 16 polls total, 13 of them are groups identified as Democrat pollsters.

So the dirty secret is that Romney has been even or winning Iowa for some time. Where there is smoke there is fire, and the number of Dem organized polls and the deviation from the average of many of them is smoke.

The only Iowa poll taken this month has Romney up by 2%. The poll of polls and the media would be talking about Romney’s lead in Iowa if not for the averaging in of these polls of 6 weeks ago and 8 weeks ago performed by Democrat Pollsters.

When the media can no longer produce poor Registered voter polls from Democrat groups to hide the real numbers we will see Iowa and Florida as two more states leaning red. It already exists, it is just being hidden and ignored.

What does that tell you when your prediction is off by 12% from the average of all sources?

It says what everyone already knows, the NYTimes would be more valuable as an information source if rolled around a cardboard tube in my bathroom.

The NYTimes, the most biased and sold out media source on paper has Obama winning the office by only 29 electoral votes.
This slim 299 Electoral vote victory includes Obama winning Florida, Iowa, Wisconsin, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Ohio. This is 8 states the Obama lead is between 0 and 6%. Even with all 8 of these the ultra liberal NYTimes has Obama winning in a narrow victory as of today.

The irony that the title of this article leading me to these numbers was:
“Aug. 18: Obama Leads Big — Among Those Least Likely to Vote”.

I will file the relevence of this article right next to:
“Today’s Weather Report on Jupiter’s moon”

Both have about the same place in the reality of my day. the “woulda-coulda” votes of those who won’t vote sounds like the NYTimes trying desperately to have a positive headline to print. They got together in the planning room on speaker phone with Obama and invented the “would-coulda” voter demographic.

When I see a paper reaching to try and print a headline with “Obama leads Big” and printing next to statistics that show the opposite I am happy with the reality that print newspapers will soon be in the pile of obsolete technology next to my 8 tracks, beta tapes and pagers.

The reality is that every poll in the last 10 days has Romney winning nationwide. What is more the idiot writing the above mentioned story uses as his source “headlines” of newspapers. Most of the newspapers are owned by the same one company which has always endorsed the Democrat.

So the news goes from Obama to the newspapers to write, then to the Daily Kos and Obama to quote back like it is fact because it was written.
When your source of factual information is a headline from another newspaper, you have completely lost touch with reality.

In 3 days time the RCP average of polls will no longer include the polls from over 2 weeks ago in its’ calculations. This will be in 72 hours and will be the first RCP average to show Romney leading in national polls. I am certain the many Democrat owned newspapers and organization that purposely make low quality polls will be pumping out “registered voter” polls of small sample sizes to dilute this reality this week. The threat of Romney’s lead in recent polls becoming to hard to his is right around the corner.

At last check Obama leads by 2.8% in the poll of polls, which includes 5 polls of registered voters. RV polls historically are 4% wrong in favor of Democrats. This means Obama has been trailing in reality for weeks, but this week it will become to hard to hide unless Dems call on their subservient news outlets to generate some bad polls quick.

This week Gallup and Rasmussen have Romney leading. Rasmussen has been wrong by less that 1% in both 2004 and 2008 presidential elections.

We have been hard at the issue of registered voter polls vs the more accurate likely voter polls.

The conclusion is that organizations that do small sample sized registered voter polls exist only to affect the averages of all polls. People tend to ignore many polls or investigate the sources, but the RCP average or other average of all recent polls tend to have more credibility.

With this fact why not roll out poll after poll using less than the best methodology with the goal; of getting headlines and in the same move to distort the averages of all polls with you bad data.
Every pollster know registered voter polls are wrong in favor of Democrat candidates by 2% to 4%. No pollster argues this fact. If this is true and common knowledge why is there not an adjustment made to the final numbers with the goal of getting a accurate estimate of outcome?

Good polls adjust for voter breakdown, demographic and all other factors to simulate a real election yet many of these fraud pollsters continue to use registered voters and not adjusting for the know flaw in this sample.

The easy answer? They want to keep pumping out polls that error in favor of Obama to influence public opinion of who is winning and who is popular. We cover the facts behind reality in this post about Likely voter polls showing Romney even or winning since selecting Paul Ryan.

If we visit RCP we see that not a single LIKELY voter poll in the past 3 months shows Obama winning by more than 4%. The margin of error is generally around 3%. Even the most favorable Likely voter poll shows this race a toss up. On the other hand “registered voter polls” show Obama winning on average by 3% to 7%. These flawed polls get rolled out week after week and they do their job of hiding the more accurate polls.

Keep pumping out bad information you know to be flawed to hide the fact that Obama is not winning. Pretty sure practice this is the definition of misinformation.

At the time of writing this the latest Rasmussen tracking Poll has Romney ahead by 1% among registered voters. This is an accurate poll that uses the best practice of registered voters in it’s sample. This poll also uses 1500 person sample size unlike the < 1000 samples used by the garbage CNN, ABC, Democracy Corp and others use. Those sources that always show Obama winning by 4-8% use samples less than 1000 people and they use registered voters.

Those sources also know that the registered voter polls will be wrong by 2-4%, it is just a historic fact.

So if they know their results will be inaccurate, and they know by how much….why is it they keep doing it, printing it as facts and seem OK with being wrong in Obama’s favor week after week?

Over at the New York Times, Nate Silver even admits in this piece that registered voter polls are 2% inaccurate in favor of Democrats. But pollsters like this always say “RV polls ‘favor’ Democrats. If a poll deviates from the reality and outcome that’s not favor, that’s wrong, inaccurate and misleading.